What I'm Reading

A list of books at various stages of my reading pipeline.

Last updated: December 2019. If this gets more than a few months out of date, I'd appreciate a gentle reminder to update it (@kevinsimler).

Currently reading

  • Eugene Gendlin, Focusing. Recommended by @QiaochuYuan (and others).
  • Deirdre McCloskey, Bourgeois Dignity. Recommended by @antonhowes.

On the radar

  • John McPhee, Basin and Range.
  • Thomas Metzinger, Being No One.
  • James Davidson and William Rees-Mogg, The Sovereign Individual.

Recently finished

"Paused" indicates a book that I've read at least a few chapters of, but have since stopped reading. Realistically I'm probably done with these "paused" books, but my brain is loss averse and wants a label that suggests the possibility of return ūüėČ

  • Dan Carlin, Blueprint for Armageddon [podcast]. Recommended by @alexeyguzey. As most of you know, Dan Carlin is an international treasure. His perspective is broad, balanced, and humane; he's far and away my preferred narrator of history. This is his six-part series on the Great War, and it's worth each of the 23 hours you'll spend listening to it (15 at 1.5x). (All other Dan Carlin/Hardcore History content is highly recommended as well.)
  • Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score [paused]. Recommended by Sophia, @delta_ark, and many others. I'm intrigued by this new(?) wave of body-centered therapies and discourse around trauma. A few friends who've spent considerable energy in this idea-space tell me that basically everyone is walking around saddled with traumas. (Or things that can be productively modeled as traumas from the perspective of these therapies.) So I thought¬†The Body Keeps the Score would be a good introduction, but a few chapters in and I'm just too bored by the pace of this book. Gonna try¬†Focusing by Gendlin and maybe Unlocking the Emotional Brain instead. Update: Just read the Slate Star Codex review, which is unsurprisingly good.
  • Vaclav Smil, Energy and Civilization [paused]. Recommended by @arjunblj. I initially decided to buy this book because, well, energy is a pretty fundamental building block of the universe. It's key to understanding phenomena as disparate as stars, life, and the neoliberal world order. So I thought I would enjoy getting a more detailed understanding of its role in human history. And I have! But I didn't realize just how much detail I was signing up for. It's both overwhelming and very cool at the same time. I think the main thing I'm taking away from this book is a sense for the variety and subtlety of different agricultural practices, each needing to be invented and then diffused throughout a culture, even when (as is often the case) the invention isn't clearly superior to its predecessors. Agriculture isn't just sticking seeds in the ground and coming back for the plant a few months later. It's a truly intricate affair.
  • Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism¬†[paused]. Meh.
  • Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities [paused]. Oh man, this is an amazing read. (Warning: I wouldn't have appreciated this book before living in a proper/dense/walkable urban area.)
  • Robert Jackall, Moral Mazes. Recommended by Zvi (quotes) and @s_r_constantin (review). Great book. I'd describe it as an ethnography of middle managers. You get to see a lot of the perverse incentives from the perspective of the players involved. I read it about the same time as watching the Chernobyl miniseries and I thought the two paired well together, since the Soviets had a very corporate system.
  • Ian Worthington, The Long Shadow of the Ancient Greek World [lecture series]. I probably finished about half this lecture series before giving up. The content was great, but I found the lecturer's style a bit off-putting.
  • Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media. Recommended by @david_perell, @kneelingbus, and many others. Man, I really wanted to like this, but just didn't connect with it. I think it's one of those cases where a book has so thoroughly transformed our intellectual culture that reading the original is a little underwhelming. Because I certainly love McLuhan's ideas. I just didn't enjoy the book.
  • Garrett Fagan, The History of Ancient Rome [lecture series]. Great. I really liked Fagan's style and approach to telling history, and found him a very reliable narrator. This series is organized more thematically than Duncan's series (below), especially during the imperial period, which I greatly appreciated.
  • Mike Duncan, The History of Rome [podcast]. Nominally a podcast, but more like an audiobook or lecture series. Duncan takes you through the full history or Rome, from its early Regal period, through the Republic, and to the very end of the Empire. I gave up on it shortly after the Republic turned to the Empire, though, when it turned into an endless parade of palace intrigues. At first I was pretty happy with the series, but after listening to the Garrett Fagan's version of it (above), I became disenchanted with Duncan's version. It was too much a series of events, not organized thematically enough for my tastes.
  • James C. Scott, Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. Excellent. Highly recommended for just about everyone. There are two things in particular I appreciated about this book: (1) States are deeply important to how our world works, and Against the Grain investigates them in their earliest, inchoate forms. The logic of things is often laid bare at their beginnings, and this is a perfect instance of the phenomenon. (2) Scott inquires about the origin of states from a contrarian perspective. The default view that you may have inherited from our culture (as I did) portrays states as unequivocally beneficial. Civilization = good, barbarism = ugly. But Scott nearly turns this on its head. He understands life in a state ‚ÄĒ¬†especially an early agrarian state like Uruk ‚ÄĒ to be oppressive, crowded, monotonous, and subject to all sorts of ecological and political shocks (famine, drought, pestilence, war). As you might imagine, this turns out to be an especially interesting perspective from which to inquire about early statehood, because he can't assume that life in a state is straightforwardly better than life outside it.
  • Richard O. Prum, The Evolution of Beauty [skimmed around to get the gist of it, but didn't read it cover to cover]. Provides a valuable perspective on evolution, namely, that runaway sexual selection is real and exceptionally arbitrary. Overall I was pretty disappointed in it, though. The book purports to be about beauty but focuses exclusively on sexual selection (mate choice), without so much as an index entry for flowers (smh...). In other words, the title is misleading.
  • Tara Westover, Educated. Memoir of a woman who was raised in very fringe and isolated family of Mormon survivalists, who later reconnected with mainstream society by getting into college. I don't read a lot of memoirs so I'm not well-calibrated here, but I thought it was an interesting story and very well told.
  • more...

Other people's "reading" pages

All time most influential

These are the three books I recommend to everyone, largely because they're awesome, broadly appealing, and mercifully short:

  • Keith Johnstone, Impro. Packs more fascinating nuggets of insight per page than almost any other book. It's weird to be so enchanted by a book about how to teach improv. But when you're improvising, you need very quick, very accurate rules for parsing a scene and understanding your role in it. As it turns out, those rules are useful both on and off the stage.
  • Will and Ariel Durant, The Lessons of History. Clocking in at just over 100 pages, it's a concise, elegant summary of the authors' 11-volume, 10,000-page series, The Story of Civilization. The ideas are broad without being shallow, and the language is absolutely breathtaking. I recommend this book to just about everyone.
  • Alan Watts, The Tao of Philosophy. Takes me very much outside of my Western/scientific/Aspie comfort zone, but in a way that really resonates with me.

And here are the rest of the books that have had the greatest influence on my thinking (in no particular order):

  • Julian Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness. Worth reading even if it's wrong. Here's my review.
  • Erving Goffman, Interaction Ritual. Illustrates, probably better than any other book I've read, the intricate logic of social interaction.
  • Joseph Jordania, Why Do People Sing?. You can read my summary here. An absolute mindfuck of a theory. Like Jaynes, worth reading even if it's wrong.
  • Jean-Louis Dessalles, Why We Talk. Starts out slow and perhaps tedious, but picks up speed at a compounding rate, each chapter more insightful than the last. Chapters 17 and 18 explain the deepest principles of human social behavior better than any other 30 pages I've read.
  • Christopher Boehm, Hierarchy in the Forest. If you don't really believe, deep in your bones, that human beings are animals, this book will fix you.
  • Jonathan Haidt, The Righteous Mind. How humans actually, empirically, think about morality.
  • Judith Rich Harris, The Nurture Assumption. Why parents have less influence over their children than they think. Her follow-up book, No Two Alike, is also great, and was the basis for my series on personality.
  • Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations. If epistemology is the crux of a worldview, then this is what everything else hangs on.
  • Douglas Hofstadter and Daniel Dennett, The Mind's I. A collection of essays and stories illustrating all that is puzzling and fun about the philosophy of mind.
  • Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea. A college-level course in evolution, taught in Dennett's clear and engaging style.
  • Thomas Sowell, Knowledge and Decisions. Some good, solid theory about how institutions (rather than individuals) process knowledge and make decisions.
Last updated December 31, 2019.